Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Quilling v. Trade Partners, Inc. et al
as 1:2003cv00236
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Quilling
Defendant:
Trade Partners, Inc., Macatawa Bank Corporation and J. Michaeleen Meyer
Receiver:
Bruce S. Kramer
Objector:
Columbian Mutual Life Insurance Company and Billie J. Clifton
Movant:
Edward R. Kacos , Edwin R. Kacos and Peter Sturrus
Respondent:
Marilyn W. Keinath , Jerry Hubbell, H. Robert Horstman and others
Claimant:
Irwin Seating Company , Tradia Commerce Network, Inc., J. Michaeleen Meyer and others
Petitioner:
John R. Brand and L. Kathryn Brand
Interpleader:
Travelers Life and Annuity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Diaz v. United States of America
as 2:2010cv10352
Petitioner:
Rafael Diaz
Respondent:
United States of America
United States of America v. Sedano-Hernandez
as 2:2009cr20575
Defendant:
Cesar Rafael Sedano-Hernandez and Cesar Rafael Sedano-Hernandez
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cesar Rafael Sedano-Hernandez
as 2:2009cr20575
Defendant:
Cesar Rafael Sedano-Hernandez and Cesar Rafael Sedano-Hernandez
Plaintiff:
United States of America
United States of America v. Murrey
as 2:2009cr20473
Defendant:
Rafael Cornell Murrey and Rafael Cornell Murrey
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Rafael Cornell Murrey
as 2:2009cr20473
Defendant:
Rafael Cornell Murrey and Rafael Cornell Murrey
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Diaz v. USA
as 2:2009cv13782
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Rafael Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Type:
Other Statutes
**CASE MERGED** ALL ENTRIES MUST BE MADE IN 09-20473 United States of America v. Murrey
as 2:2009mj30385
Defendant:
Rafael Cornell Murrey and Rafael Cornell Murrey
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Rafael Cornell Murrey
as 2:2009mj30385
Defendant:
Rafael Cornell Murrey and Rafael Cornell Murrey
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
