Cases 41 - 49 of 49
READ v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
as 1:2012cv05100
Plaintiff:
MARY LINDA READ
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
HUNTINGTON LEARNING CENTERS, INC. v. READ IT, N.C., INC et al
as 2:2012cv03598
Plaintiff:
HUNTINGTON LEARNING CENTERS, INC.
Defendant:
READ IT, N.C., INC, WALLACE EDUCATIONAL HOLDINGS, L.L.C., SARA WALLACE and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv07638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 41 U.S.C. § 1463
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv04969
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
REICHHOLD, INC. v. UNITED STATES METALS, et al
as 2:2003cv00453
Plaintiff:
REICHHOLD, INC.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES METALS REFINING COMPANY , CYPRUS AMAX MINERALS COMPANY , AMAX REALTY DEVELOPMENT, INC. and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
40 SAYERVILLE REALTY CORP., STAFLEX SPECIALTY ESTERS, INC., BAYER CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
TRAMAC CORPORATION v. KEMPER EQUIPMENT, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv04339
Plaintiff:
TRAMAC CORPORATION
Defendant:
KEMPER EQUIPMENT, INC., BEDROCK QUARRIES, INC., READING MATERIALS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
STUART v. READ
as 2:2007cv01935
Plaintiff:
GORDON T. STUART
Defendant:
CHRIS READ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
WARREN HOSPITAL v. AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING, PA et al
as 2:2007cv00558
Plaintiff:
WARREN HOSPITAL
Defendant:
AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING, PA and CNA INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
