Cases 41 - 47 of 47
Smith v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2011cv00879
Petitioner:
James Earl Smith
Respondent:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (RJDCF)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2011cv00880
Plaintiff:
James Earl Smith
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (RJDCF), A. Allamby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andre Jones v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2011cv00296
Plaintiff:
Andre Jones
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility, California State Prison, Los Angeles County/Lancaster (LAC) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunsmore v. San Diego County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2011cv00083
Plaintiff:
Darryl Lee Dunsmore
Defendant:
San Diego County Sheriff's Department, City of San Diego, William B Kolender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andre Jones v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2010cv02217
Defendant:
K. Bradford, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, California State Prison, Los Angeles County/Lancaster (LAC) and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Jones
Johnson v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2010cv00340
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility, E Contreras and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bass v. County of San Diego et al
as 3:2008cv02135
Plaintiff:
Robert Curtis Bass Inc. and Robert Curtis Bass
Defendant:
County of San Diego, State of California, San Diego Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0025 Clayton Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
