Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Ostrander v. Richerson
as 7:2017cv00143
Petitioner:
Daniel Glen Ostrander
Respondent:
Kendall Richerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Franklin v. Davis et al
as 7:2017cv00109
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Franklin
Defendant:
Hazelle M. Davis, Maria E. Muirhead, Frankie L. Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garza v. Skinnier et al
as 7:2017cv00028
Plaintiff:
Erasmo Martinez Garza
Defendant:
K Skinnier, S Baker, A Franco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lenz v. Richerson
as 5:2016cv01258
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Kenneth Lee Lenz
Respondent:
Kendall Richerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Richerson
as 5:2016cv01232
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
Kendall Richerson
Petitioner:
Robert Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cole v. Lakin et al
as 7:2016cv00136
Plaintiff:
Wayne Edward Cole
Defendant:
Daniel A Lakin, Richerson and Sarhani
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gutierrez v. Arnold et al
as 2:2015cv00194
Plaintiff:
Alvaro Cruz Gutierrez
Respondent:
Norvel Arnold, Kendall T Richerson, L. Velarde and others
Defendant:
Dalhart Unit Mailroom Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gutierrez v. Unknown Medical Provider et al
as 6:2015cv00508
Plaintiff:
Alvaro Cruz Gutierrez
Defendant:
Unknown Medical Provider, Unknown X-Ray Technician, Kenyon Page and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dearborn National Life Insurance Company v. Richerson et al
as 1:2014cv00390
Plaintiff:
Dearborn National Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Cynthia Richerson and Vivian Richerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Ortega v. Livingston et al
as 2:2014cv00082
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Ortega, Jr
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Jason Heaton, Barry L Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
