Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Nguyen et al v. Dejun et al
as 2:2010cv02244
Defendant:
Zou Dejun, Qui Jianping, Kennith C Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Andy Nguyen
Nominal Defendant:
Rino International Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Weinstock et al v. Dejun et al
as 2:2010cv02209
Plaintiff:
Robert Binnewies, Andy Nguyen, Rino International Corporation and others
Defendant:
Zou Dejun, Qui Jianping, Kennith C Johnson and others
Nominal Defendant:
Rino International Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Paul H Vu v. Rino International Corporation et al
as 8:2010cv01908
Defendant:
Zou Dejun, Qiu Jianping, Kennith C. Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Paul H Vu
Brenda Chau v. Rino International Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv09517
Plaintiff:
Brenda Chau
Defendant:
Kennith C. Johnson, Zejin Li, Jenny Liu and others
Xi Zhang v. Rino International Corporation et al
as 8:2010cv01887
Defendant:
Kennith C. Johnson, Zejin Li, Jenny Liu and others
Plaintiff:
Xi Zhang
Alan Stevens v. Rino International Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv09011
Defendant:
Zou Dejun, Qiu Jianping, Kennith C. Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Alan Stevens
Ali Baig v. Rino International Corporation et al
as 8:2010cv01754
Plaintiff:
Ali Baig
Defendant:
Yu Li, Yi Liu, Rino International Corporation and others
Susan Hufnagle v. Rino International Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv08695
Plaintiff:
Susan Hufnagle
Defendant:
Kenneth C. Johnson, Zejin Li, Jenny Liu and others
AMMENTI v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv72904
Plaintiff:
RINO AMMENTI
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00744
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
