Cases 41 - 47 of 47
GANN v. A.O. SMITH ELECTRICAL PRODUCTS COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv69942
Plaintiff:
BILLY RAY GANN
Defendant:
A.O. SMITH ELECTRICAL PRODUCTS COMPANY, A.O. SMITH CORPORATION, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LELKO v. THE ANACONDA COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv60401
Plaintiff:
LEONARD J. LELKO and LEONARD J. LELKO
Defendant:
THE ANACONDA COMPANY, THE ANACONDA COMPANY, THE ANACONDA COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Brown et al v. Albany International et al
as 2:2008cv00046
Plaintiff:
Daniel R. Brown, Dennis E. Butler, William Cadle and others
Defendant:
Albany International, Allis-Chalmer Corporation Product Liability Trust, American Optical Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Adams et al v. Albany International et al
as 2:2007cv01064
Plaintiff:
Martha Adams, Cynthia Coachman, Valie Ogles and others
Defendant:
Albany International, Allis-Chalmer Corporation Product Liability Trust, American Optical Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Humphreys et al v. A.O. Smith Electrical Products Company et al
as 2:2007cv00607
Plaintiff:
Grady O. Humphreys, Bobby Essary, Billy Ray Gann and others
Defendant:
A.O. Smith Electrical Products Company, A.O. Smith Corporation, Albany International and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Thomas v. Amercable,Inc et al.
as 0:2007cv60497
Plaintiff:
Deborah Thomas and Robert L. Thomas
Defendant:
Amercable,Inc, American Optical Corporation, A.W. Chesterton Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
AUSTIN, FRANCIS v. THE ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY
as 3:1997cv00411
Plaintiff:
Francis Austin , William Carlson , Thomas Cunningham and others
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, C S R, Ltd., Chicago Firebrick Company and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
