Cases 41 - 50 of 549
THOMAS v. SEARS ROEBUCK & COMPANY
as 2:2015cv00945
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE E. THOMAS
Defendant:
SEARS ROEBUCK & COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. ROBINSON MALL, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv01715
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER E. BROWN
Defendant:
ROBINSON MALL, INC., J.C. PENNEY PROPERTIES, INC and SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE et al v. SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION
as 5:2014cv02002
Plaintiff:
ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE
Defendant:
SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION
Movant:
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAN OSTEN et al v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
as 2:2014cv00314
Plaintiff:
MARCIA VAN OSTEN and WAYNE VAN OSTEN
Defendant:
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv07498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
BRAY v. SUMMERS et al
as 2:2013cv06553
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA BRAY
Defendant:
WILLIAM D. SUMMERS, JR. and SEARS ROEBUCK & CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv06192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. ELECTROLUX USA, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv04499
Plaintiff:
OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and JANET JACOBSON
Defendant:
ELECTROLUX USA, INC., ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC. , ELECTROLUX NORTH AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
WHARTON v. SEARS ROEBUCK AND COMPANY
as 2:2013cv01088
Plaintiff:
STELLA WHARTON
Defendant:
SEARS ROEBUCK AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
