Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Johnson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2008cv00160
Petitioner:
Gary S Johnson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson et al v. Gross
as 3:2008mc00047
Plaintiff:
Robbie S. Johnson, Robbie S. Johnson and Robbie S. Johnson
Defendant:
Mitchell Alan Gross, 5th Ring Enterprises Limited Partnership, Debra L. Gross and others
Receiver:
Kevin O'Halloran
Johnson v. Thomas et al
as 5:2008cv00051
Plaintiff:
Gary S Johnson
Defendant:
Unidentified Thomas, Jr and Unknown Hinton
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jeffery et al v. Koppers Industries, Inc., et al
as 1:2008cv00133
Plaintiff:
Corey C. Jeffery, Donnell Deveon Jenkins, Cheyenne S. Johnson and others
Defendant:
Koppers Industries, Inc., Koppers Industries, Inc., Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Johnson v Texas Parole Board
as 5:2008cv00036
Plaintiff:
Gary S Johnson
Defendant:
Texas Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Director, TDCJ-ID
as 5:2008cv00023
Petitioner:
Gary S. Johnson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-ID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v Dir TDCJ
as 5:2008cv00010
Petitioner:
Gary S. Johnson
Respondent:
Dir, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Richerson et al
as 6:2007cv00513
Plaintiff:
Gary S. Johnson
Defendant:
FNU Richerson, Beto Unit and Head Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Hudson
as 5:2007cv00148
Petitioner:
Gary S. Johnson
Respondent:
Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. UCC Members
as 5:2007cv00149
Plaintiff:
Gary S. Johnson
Defendant:
UCC Members
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
