Cases 41 - 50 of 220
US v. Sepulveda
as 20-2193
Interested Party:
JUAN GARCIA, RODNEY SANTI and PETER NATAL
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
GEORGE SEPULVEDA, a/k/a King Paradise, a/k/a Dice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv24621
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
HERNANDEZ-SANTI v. 3M COMPANY et al
as FLN/9:20-CV-04128
Plaintiff:
HERNANDEZ-SANTI
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
HERNANDEZ-SANTI v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv04128
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LOUIS M HERNANDEZ-SANTI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SANTIFUL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv03472
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES A SANTIFUL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tania Batache v. Roque Santi, et alIn re: Tania Batache v. Roque Santi, et al
as 20-60049
Debtor:
In re: TANIA ELISSIA BATACHE
Appellant:
TANIA ELISSIA BATACHE
Appellee:
MAFALDA FONTANA and ROQUE SANTI
WHAM-O HOLDING, LTD. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule "A"
as 1:2020cv05622
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule "A", BHERX Official Store, LVLIANGSHI and others
Plaintiff:
INTERSPORT CORP. d/b/a WHAM-O, WHAM-O HOLDING, LTD. and Intersport Corp. doing business as WHAM-O
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Jehan Mir v. Ten Unknown FBI Agents, et al
as 20-55739
Defendant / Appellee:
RAJ MALHOTRA, in Personal, Individual Capacity, TIMOTHY J. WHALL, an individual, ROSALINDA HERNANDEZ, an individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEHAN ZEB MIR, M.D.
ZUCCARO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv49896
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO SANTI JOHANN ZUCCARO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
