Cases 41 - 50 of 120
Woodfork v. Nunn, et al
as 22-6022
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES JERMAINE WOODFORK
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT NUNN, individually and in official capacity, Warden, FNU RACKLEY, individually and in official capacity, CO, MIKE ROGERS, individually and in official capacity, Chief of Security and others
Henson v. Nunn
as 5:2022cv00105
Respondent:
John O'Connell, Scott Nunn, Director DOC Scott Crow and others
Petitioner:
Tommie D Henson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Spaulding v. Nunn et al
as 5:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
Richard Patrick Spaulding
Defendant:
Warden Scott Nunn, Asst Warden Edward Mayfield, Chaplain FNU Weaver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henson v. Nunn
as 6:2022cv00037
Respondent:
John O'Connell, Scott Nunn, Scott Crow and others
Petitioner:
Tommie D. Henson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Nunn
as 5:2022cv00076
Respondent:
John O'Connell, Director DOC Scott Crow, John O and others
Petitioner:
John Henry Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Nunn
as 5:2022cv00075
Petitioner:
Robert E Smith
Respondent:
Scott Nunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Musick v. Nunn
as 5:2022cv00069
Respondent:
John O'Connell, Director DOC Scott Crow, John O and others
Petitioner:
Kenneth R Musick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gillispie v. Nunn
as 4:2022cv00043
Petitioner:
Mark W Gillispie
Respondent:
Scott Nunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Musick v. Nunn
as 6:2022cv00026
Respondent:
John O'Connell, Scott Crow, John O and others
Petitioner:
Kenneth R. Musick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Nunn
as 6:2022cv00027
Respondent:
John O'Connell, Scott Crow, John O and others
Petitioner:
John H. Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
