Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 56
R. Daniel Conlon, Bishop of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Joliet, Illinois, as Successor Trustee Under the Provisions of the Trust Agreement Dated December 31, 1949 et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Departm Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv03932
Plaintiff: R. Daniel Conlon, Bishop of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Joliet, Illinois, as Successor Trustee Under the Provisions of the Trust Agreement Dated December 31, 1949, Catholic Charities Diocese of Joliet, Inc., The Most Reverend Thomas John Paprocki, Roman Catholic Bishop of the Diocese of Springfield-in-Illinois and others
Defendant: Kathleen Sebelius, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Hilda Solis, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Labor, Timothy Geithner, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Treasury and others
Amicus Curiae: American Center For Law & Justice
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 702
Metropolitan Hospital v. HHS, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-2466
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant: METROPOLITAN HOSPITAL, a Michigan non-profit corporation
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Metropolitan Hospital v. HHS, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-2465
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant: METROPOLITAN HOSPITAL, a Michigan non-profit corporation
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
U.S. Citizens Association, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-3798
Plaintiff - Appellant: U.S. CITIZENS ASSOCIATION, JAMES GRAPEK and MAURICE A. THOMPSON
Plaintiff: EILEEN DANNEMANN, et al.
Defendant - Appellee: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, TIMOTHY F. GEITHNER, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of the United States and others
U.S. Citizens Association, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-3327
Plaintiff - Appellant: U.S. CITIZENS ASSOCIATION, JAMES GRAPEK and MAURICE A. THOMPSON
Plaintiff: EILEEN DANNEMANN
Defendant - Appellee: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, TIMOTHY F. GEITHNER, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of the United States and others
Tri-County Hospice, Inc. v. Sebeliu
as 11-7017
Plaintiff - Appellant: TRI-COUNTY HOSPICE, INC.
Defendant - Appellee: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Tri-County Hospice, Inc. v. Sebeliu
as 11-7015
Plaintiff - Appellee: TRI-COUNTY HOSPICE, INC.
Defendant - Appellant: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Tri-County Hospice, Inc. v. Sebeliu
as 10-7060
Plaintiff - Appellant: TRI-COUNTY HOSPICE, INC.
Defendant - Appellee: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Tri-County Hospice, Inc. v. Sebeliu
as 10-7058
Plaintiff - Appellee: TRI-COUNTY HOSPICE, INC.
Defendant - Appellant: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Tri-County Hospice, Inc. v. Sebeliu
as 10-7057
Plaintiff - Appellee: TRI-COUNTY HOSPICE, INC.
Defendant - Appellant: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?