Cases 41 - 50 of 76
Simmons v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv02193
Plaintiff:
Curtis Graylin Simmons
Defendant:
Robert Ryan, Jose Compos, April Sponsel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Badger Mutual Insurance Company v. LaRose et al
as 2:2015cv01802
Plaintiff:
Badger Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Joseph Marcel LaRose, Tineka Simmons-LaRose, Perry Michael and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Simmons v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv01226
Petitioner:
Lamar V Simmons
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Simmons v. Colvin
as 2:2014cv02286
Plaintiff:
Patricia Ann Simmons
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Simmons #087136 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2014cv01599
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Wayne Calvin Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Simmons #087136 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2014cv01415
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Wayne Calvin Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Perez v. Cadtel Systems Incorporated et al
as 2:2013cv02408
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez
Defendant:
Cadtel Systems Incorporated, Jim Zicarelli, Tony Weeding and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ybarra v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2013cv01126
Plaintiff:
Robert Ybarra
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Cherry Phillips, Yolanda Fortune and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Simmons v. Ryan et al
as 2:2013cv00329
Petitioner:
Curtis Graylin Simmons
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
