Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Neal v. Stanford et al
as 7:2010cv00163
Defendant:
A. Mullins, S. Roberts, K. Schlobohm and others
Plaintiff:
James Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barbour v. Stanford et al
as 7:2010cv00146
Defendant:
Alcohol time suspensions 2403(A) may apply, K. Massey and Australopithecus Stanford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. VanDexter et al
as 1:2010cv00145
Plaintiff:
Tony Parker
Defendant:
M. VanDexter and A. Stanford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanford v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 5:2009cv00057
Plaintiff:
Barbara Jean Stanford
Defendant:
Davol Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Stanford v. Riches et al
as 3:2009cv00439
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Stanford
Defendant:
Jonathan Lee Riches, Leroy King, Laura Pendergest-Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Ravizee et al
as 7:2009cv00150
Plaintiff:
Calvin Perry
Defendant:
Brenda J. Ravizee, Robert Bivens, L. Tatro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barbour v. Stanford et al
as 7:2009cv00077
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Defendant:
M. Stanford, R. M. Garnert, Lee and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stanford International Bank, Ltd. et al
as 4:2009mc00003
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Stanford International Bank, Ltd., Stanford Group Company, Stanford Capital Management, LLC and others
Receiver:
Ralph S. Janvey
Securities And Exchange Commission v. Stanford International Bank, Ltd. et al
as 1:2009mc00009
Plaintiff:
Securities And Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Stanford International Bank, Ltd., Stanford Group Company, Stanford Capital Management, LLC and others
Wilson v. Collins et al
as 7:2008cv00638
Plaintiff:
Fred Lewis Wilson
Defendant:
B. Collins, M. Williams, H. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
