Cases 41 - 50 of 175
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03057
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02568
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02116
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mahammend v. States Attorney Allen Jason Isaac
as 1:2021cv02265
Plaintiff:
Khalid Austin Mahammend
Defendant:
States Attorney Allen Jason Isaac
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Stagg v. Judge Robert Cahill, Jr. et al
as 1:2021cv02185
Petitioner:
Jermaine Shaun Stagg
Respondent:
Judge Robert Cahill, Jr. and States Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banerjee et al v. Montgomery County, Maryland et al
as 8:2021cv01997
Plaintiff:
Mithun Banerjee and Malancha Banerjee
Defendant:
Montgomery County, Maryland, Montgomery County Executive, Maryland, Montgomery County Department of Police, Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv
Hammock v. Barbera et al
as 1:2021cv01753
Plaintiff:
Terrence Edward Hammock
Defendant:
Chief Judge Mary Ellen Barbera, Judge Robert Cahill, Jr., Judge Kathleen Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
McFadden v. Saul et al
as 8:2021cv01663
Plaintiff:
Stephen A. McFadden
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul, Robert M. Wilson, Raghav Kotval and others
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Combs v. States Attorney For St. Mary's County, Maryland
as 1:2021cv01395
Petitioner:
Thomas J. Combs
Respondent:
States Attorney For St. Mary's County, Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
