Cases 41 - 50 of 761
Marshall v. Hipcamp, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01928
Plaintiff:
Jacob Marshall
Defendant:
Hipcamp, Inc., Steven Epling and Go River, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Coppler v. Washburn et al
as 2:2022cv01913
Plaintiff:
Steven Coppler
Defendant:
superintendent Sue Washburn, Collette Peters, Nurse Blood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Krumwiede v. USA
as 3:2022cv01856
Petitioner:
Joshua Steven Krumwiede
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jefferson Packing House, LLC v. Kotek et al
as 3:2022cv01776
Plaintiff:
JEFFERSON PACKING HOUSE, LLC
Defendant:
Governor Kate Brown, Ellen Rosenblum, Steven Marks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01736
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Willis v. To Whom is Involved
as 3:2022cv01728
Plaintiff:
Steven Dawayne Willis
Defendant:
To Whom is Involved
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Gate Fourth Judicial Dist. Pros. Office
as 3:2022cv01731
Plaintiff:
His Sovereignty Steven Dawayne Willis
Defendant:
Gate Fourth Judicial Dist. Pros. Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Sicenbrud-Gate et al
as 3:2022cv01732
Plaintiff:
Steven Dawayne Willis
Defendant:
Sicenbrud-Gate and PPB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Heavens-Gate et al
as 3:2022cv01727
Plaintiff:
Steven Dawayne Willis
Defendant:
Heavens-Gate, Finders and Anzi Informants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Sicenbrood
as 3:2022cv01729
Plaintiff:
Steven Dawayne Willis
Defendant:
Sicenbrood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
