Cases 41 - 50 of 859
Johnson v. Diffusion Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00789
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Defendant:
Diffusion Pharmaceuticals Inc., Robert Cobuzzi, Jr., Jane H. Hollingsworth and others
Schaper v. Lensar, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00692
Plaintiff:
Ryan Schaper and Christopher P. Bolster
Defendant:
Lensar, Inc., Nicholas T. Curtis, Thomas R. Staab, II and others
Husty v. Catalent, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00891
Plaintiff:
Cameron Husty
Defendant:
J. Martin Carroll, Madhavan Balachandran, Michael J. Barber and others
Nominal Defendant:
Catalent, Inc.
BaoNgoc T. Vo v. Thomas M. Seibel et al
as 1:2023cv00428
Plaintiff:
BaoNgoc T. Vo
Defendant:
Thomas M. Seibel, Patricia A. House, Lisa A. Davis and others
Nominal Defendant:
C3.ai, Inc.
Stabile v. Bezos et al
as 1:2023cv00216
Plaintiff:
Thomas Stabile
Defendant:
Jeffrey P. Bezos, Andrew R. Jassy, Brian T. Olsavsky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
In Re: Amazon.com, Inc. Stockholder Derivative Litigation
as 1:2023cv00196
Plaintiff:
Jay Smith and Thomas Stabile
Defendant:
Jeffrey P. Bezos, Andrew R. Jassy, Brian T. Olsavsky and others
Nominal Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Averon US, Inc. v. AT&T Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv01341
Plaintiff:
Averon US, Inc.
Defendant:
AT&T Inc. and ZenKey LLC
Nelson v. Tessco Technologies Incorporated et al
as 1:2023cv00649
Plaintiff:
Thomas Nelson
Defendant:
Tessco Technologies Incorporated, Timothy Bryan, Matthew W. Brewer and others
In Re: Wayne T. Gamble
as 1:2023mc00329
Petitioner:
Wayne T. Gamble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Webb Jr. v. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2023cv00594
Plaintiff:
William J Webb Jr.
Defendant:
Department of Justice, United States Postal Service, Renee Hrivnak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
