Cases 41 - 50 of 92
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv02369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Tate v. Sloan et al
as 1:2016cv01866
Petitioner:
David Tate
Respondent:
Brigham Sloan and State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tate v. Bunting
as 1:2014cv02582
Petitioner:
Lloyd Tate
Respondent:
Jason Bunting
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tate v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00395
Plaintiff:
Larry G. Tate
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Comer et al v. DirectTV, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv01986
Plaintiff:
Charles Comer , Gregory Evans , Paul Groninger and others
Defendant:
DirectTV, Inc., DirectTV, LLC, DIRECTSAT USA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Tate v. CWL Investments, LLC et al
as 3:2014cv02071
Plaintiff:
Kyle L. Tate
Defendant:
CWL Investments, LLC , Clifford W. Lunney and John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mackowiak v. Central Credit Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01961
Plaintiff:
Robert Mackowiak
Defendant:
Central Credit Services, Inc. , LVNV Funding LLC , Sherman Originator LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Payne et al v. Pummill et al
as 2:2013cv01172
Plaintiff:
Lowell N. Payne, Clifford L. Rucker, James Robinson and others
Defendant:
Cathy Pummill, Jane Doe Park, Amy Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Tate v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp20899
Plaintiff:
Sharon C. Tate
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
