Cases 41 - 50 of 10,827
Brantley v. Lumpkin
as 24-10363
Petitioner:
Ross Thomas Brantley, III
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Smith v. Lumpkin
as 24-10362
Petitioner:
Joseph Leonard Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
McDonald v. Lumpkin
as 24-40269
Petitioner:
Joseph Christopher McDonald
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Boswell v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
John Boswell and John A Boswell
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, TDC Region 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roy v. Lumpkin
as 24-40116
Petitioner:
Alex Joseph Roy
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Rogers v. Lumpkin
as 24-20169
Petitioner:
Victor Charles Rogers
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Schorsch v. Kwarteng
as 24-40133
Plaintiff:
James Schorsch
Defendant:
Isaac Kwarteng and Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Albarado v. Lumpkin
as 24-10163
Petitioner:
Juan Manuel Albarado
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 24-40255
Plaintiff:
Antonio A. Garcia
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and State of Texas
Briones v. Lumpkin
as 24-10348
Petitioner:
Jose Nieves Briones
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
