Cases 41 - 50 of 102
MITCHELL v. JOHNSON
as 1:2018cv01151
Plaintiff:
WALLACE MITCHELL
Defendant:
LENNARD JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MITCHELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2017cv01699
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , C. EPHRUSSI , AMY MORGAN and others
Plaintiff:
WALLACE MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
ROSEBAR et al v. BROOKS et al
as 1:2017cv00978
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ROSEBAR and ERIN ROSEBAR
Defendant:
DAVID BROOKS, WENDELL ROBINSON, WILLIAM C. JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MITCHELL v. JOHNSON
as 1:2017cv00764
Petitioner:
WALLACE MITCHELL
Respondent:
LENNARD JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HAKE et al v. BANK MARKAZI JOMHOURI ISLAMI IRAN et al
as 1:2017cv00114
Plaintiff:
KELLI D. HAKE , DENISE YORK , RUSSEL YORK and others
Defendant:
BANK MARKAZI JOMHOURI ISLAMI IRAN, BANK MELLI IRAN, MELLI BANK PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
WALLACE v. PENCE
as 1:2017cv00014
Plaintiff:
JIMMY WALLACE
Defendant:
MIKE PENCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FREEMAN v. FADD et al
as 1:2016cv02134
Plaintiff:
MARK ELLIOTT FREEMAN
Defendant:
FADD, JOHN HESS, HANK WRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LEMON v. KRAMER et al
as 1:2016cv02025
Plaintiff:
ARRON FREDERICK LEMON
Defendant:
MARY MORTON KRAMER , TIMOTHY JOHN MCCRONE , LENORE ROSALIE GELFMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WALLACE v. UNITED HOSPITALITY SOLUTIONS, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv01697
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WALLACE
Defendant:
UNITED HOSPITALITY SOLUTIONS, LLC and RENAISSANCE HOTEL OPERATING COMPANY
Cross_claimant:
RENAISSANCE HOTEL OPERATING COMPANY
Cross_defendant:
UNITED HOSPITALITY SOLUTIONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
