Cases 41 - 50 of 63
SMITH BEY v. UNIVERSITY MORTGAGE et al
as 1:2014cv01219
Plaintiff:
TAMMIE SMITH BEY
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY MORTGAGE, S. LEE PAKE and WILLIAM KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FANNING v. BELL et al
as 1:2013cv01937
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. FANNING
Defendant:
JAMES AUSTIN WAYNE BELL, TAMMY WAYNETTE BELL, SELENA MARIE WALL and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
BEY v. WASHINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 1:2013cv01687
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN KING BEY
Defendant:
WASHINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, TAMMY L. DELORME, STAN L. PRITZKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01601
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RILEY et al v. RICHARDSON et al
as 1:2013cv01263
Plaintiff:
PHILIP JUSTIN RILEY and GLENN MICHAEL KUDER
Defendant:
DESS RICHARDSON, JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
RICHARDSON v. RICHARDSON et al
as 1:2013cv00868
Plaintiff:
ANGELO RICHARDSON
Defendant:
TAMMY RICHARDSON, TAMMY WATSON, DEMARIOUS CHUNG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
WADE v. MILLER et al
as 1:2013cv00708
Plaintiff:
E K WADE
Defendant:
JEFF MILLER, GARY ACKERMAN, SANDY ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHERIE v. SULLIVAN et al
as 1:2013mc00139
Plaintiff:
TAMMY CHERIE
Defendant:
BRIAN SULLIVAN, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and KAMALA HARRIS
Cause Of Action: MS:MiscOrd
O'NEAL v. KEENAN et al
as 1:2013cv00180
Petitioner:
LAFRANCES DUDLEY O'NEAL
Respondent:
CLIFFORD KEENAN, TAMMY EVERITT, U.S. PROBATION DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
O'NEAL v. PRETRIAL SERVICES et al
as 1:2013cv00179
Plaintiff:
LAFRANCES DUDLEY O'NEAL
Defendant:
PRETRIAL SERVICES , U.S PROBATION DEPARTMENT , U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
