Cases 41 - 50 of 55
City of Carlsbad v. I & W, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00080
Plaintiff:
City of Carlsbad
Defendant:
I & W, Inc. , B & E, Inc., Mid-Continent Casualty, Co. and others
Cross_claimant:
Admiral Insurance Company
Cross_defendant:
I & W, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Admiral Insurance Company
Counter_defendant:
City of Carlsbad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Davis v. City of Carlsbad et al
as 1:2011cv00835
Plaintiff:
Melissa Davis
Defendant:
City of Carlsbad and Shawn Wiggins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sanchez et al v. Sanchez et al
as 2:2011cv00713
Plaintiff:
Leo Sanchez and Maria Seres
Defendant:
Allen Sanchez, Jr., Jon Moyers, Trey Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenney v. Japan et al
as 2:2011cv05341
Defendant:
AIA, AIG, AT and T and others
Plaintiff:
John B Kenney
Kyoto Young Womens Academy:
Kyoto Jyosei Gakuin
Shapiro v. City of Carlsbad
as 3:2011cv01080
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Shapiro
Defendant:
City of Carlsbad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pines v. City of Carlsbad et al
as 3:2011cv01002
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Pines
Defendant:
City of Carlsbad, Paul Edmonson, City of Simi Valley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Kenney v. Japan, et al
as 11-55350
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN B. KENNEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JAPAN, AKA Japan, Inc., THE NATIONAL POLICE ASSOCIATION, TOTTORI PREFECTURAL POLICE and others
John B Kenney v. Japan et al
as 2:2011cv00630
Defendant:
AIA, AIG, AT and T and others
Plaintiff:
John B Kenney
Shawn Murray v. USDC-CASD
as 10-72828
:
In re: SHAWN MURRAY
Petitioner:
SHAWN MURRAY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO
Real Party In Interest:
CITY OF CARLSBAD, MARK RENO, DZUNG LUC and others
United States of America v. Alcoa Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv05051
Defendant:
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., Alcoa Inc., Allen Foam Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
