Cases 41 - 50 of 67
Pistone v. State of New Mexico Public Defender Department et al
as 1:2013cv00920
Plaintiff:
Scott Pistone
Defendant:
State of New Mexico Public Defender Department and T. David Eisenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Salcido v. State of New Mexico et al
as 2:2013cv00348
Plaintiff:
Vicente Salcido
Defendant:
State of New Mexico and New Mexico Public Defenders Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Olson v. City of Albuquerque et al
as 1:2013cv00231
Plaintiff:
David Brent Olson
Defendant:
City of Albuquerque, Albuquerque Police Department and Doe Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Inkies Sports, Inc. v. Facebook et al
as 1:2012cv01095
Plaintiff:
Inkies Sports, Inc.
Defendant:
Facebook, Inc., adSage Corporation, DHgate.com and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
O'Neill v. No Defendants Named
as 1:2012cv01084
Plaintiff:
Daniel O'Neill
Defendant:
No Defendants Named
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00769
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rippetoe et al v. Taos Living Center et al
as 1:2012cv00646
Defendant:
Taos Living Center and Unknown Defendants
Plaintiff:
Carol Rippetoe , Fred Rippetoe, Jr. , Dorothy Ortega and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Steinmetz v. State of New Mexico Public Defenders Office et al
as 1:2011cv00165
Plaintiff:
Bryan James Steinmetz
Defendant:
State of New Mexico Public Defenders Office , Hugh Dangler , T. David Eisenberg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv00012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
