Cases 41 - 46 of 46
Royal Manufactured Homes L L C v. New Hampshire Insurance Company L L C
as 6:2009cv01063
Plaintiff:
Royal Manufactured Homes L L C
Defendant:
New Hampshire Insurance Co L L C and New Hampshire Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Franklin County, Kentucky v. American International South I, et al
as 09-5319
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANKLIN COUNTY, KENTUCKY, on behalf of itself and a class similarly situated political subdivisions
Defendant - Appellee:
AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL SOUTH INSURANCE CO., AIG CASUALTY COMPANY, COMMERCE & INDUSTRY INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
AMERICAN GENERAL ASSURANCE COMPANY, et al.
Amacker v. Third Party Solutions Inc et al
as 3:2008cv02047
Plaintiff:
Teresa Amacker
Defendant:
Third Party Solutions Inc, New Hampshire Insurance Co and New Hampshire Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Franklin County, Kentucky v. American International South Insurance Co. et al
as 3:2008cv00039
Plaintiff:
Franklin County, Kentucky
Defendant:
American International South Insurance Co., AIG Casualty Company, American General Assurance Company and others
Petitioner:
Edward Meiman and Johanna Meiman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Gulf Coast Auto Plex L L C v. New Hampshire Insurance Co
as 2:2007cv01987
Plaintiff:
Gulf Coast Auto Plex L L C and Gulf Coast Auto Plex L L C
Defendant:
New Hampshire Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Perry et al v. Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Partnership et al
as 5:2007cv00125
Plaintiff:
Billy Lee Perry, Billy Lee Perry, Nancy T Perry and others
Defendant:
Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Partnership, Kone Inc and New Hampshire Insurance Co
Cross Claimant:
Kone Inc
Cross Defendant:
Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Partnership and New Hampshire Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
