Cases 41 - 50 of 1,599
Sandford III v. Warden
as 9:2024cv00025
Petitioner:
James Edward Sandford, III
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Shiloh v. Warden EMTC et al
as 1:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Marquis Shiloh
Defendant:
Warden EMTC, Department of Corrections and The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Jamison
as 1:2024cv00073
Petitioner:
Eric Rodney Hill
Respondent:
Warden J. Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holden v. The City Commissioner of NYC Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Charles Holden
Defendant:
The City Commissioner of NYC Corrections, Deputy Commissioner NYC Corrections, Warden MDC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estrada v. Eric M. Taylor Center Warden et al
as 1:2023cv11321
Plaintiff:
Elijah David Estrada
Defendant:
Rikers Island, Eric M. Taylor Center Warden, Department of Corrections Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bolton v. Ramos
as 1:2023cv09539
Petitioner:
Eric T. Bolton
Respondent:
Acting Warden Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hill v. Jamison
as 1:2023cv11003
Petitioner:
Eric Rodney Hill
Respondent:
Warden J. Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Noble v. Warden John/Jane Doe
as 1:2023cv11062
Petitioner:
Jerome Noble
Respondent:
Warden John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Noble v. Carter et al
as 1:2023cv11014
Plaintiff:
Jerome Noble
Defendant:
Carter, Santiago, Batchelor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perevoznikov v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv09409
Plaintiff:
Anton Perevoznikov
Defendant:
United States of America, Dr. Gerson, PA Joaquin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
