Cases 41 - 50 of 59
California Medical Transportat, et al v. Toby Douglas, et al
as 12-55334
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION, INC., a California corporation, GMD TRANSPORTATION, INC., a California corporation and LONNY SLOCUM, an individual
Defendant:
TOBY DOUGLAS, Director of the State Department of Health Services, State of California
Defendant - Appellant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
California Hospital Associatio v. Toby Douglas, et al
as 12-55331
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
TOBY DOUGLAS, Director of the State Department of Health Services, State of California
Defendant - Appellant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
Managed Pharmacy Care, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 12-55332
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MANAGED PHARMACY CARE, a California corporation, INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC., a California corporation, CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION FOR INDENPENDENT LIVING CENTERS, a California corporation and others
Defendant - Appellant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the U S Department of Health and Human Services
Defendant:
TOBY DOUGLAS, Director of Department of Health Care Services of State of California
California Medical Association, et al v. Toby Douglas, et al
as 12-55335
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, CALIFORNIA DENTAL ASSOCIATION, CALIFORNIA PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant:
TOBY DOUGLAS, Director, California Department of Health Care Services
Defendant - Appellant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services
California Medical Association, et al v. Toby Douglas, et al
as 12-55315
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, CALIFORNIA DENTAL ASSOCIATION, CALIFORNIA PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant - Appellant:
TOBY DOUGLAS, Director, California Department of Health Care Services
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services
California Medical Transportat, et al v. Toby Douglas, et al
as 12-55103
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION, INC., a California corporation, GMD TRANSPORTATION, INC., a California corporation and LONNY SLOCUM, an individual
Defendant - Appellant:
TOBY DOUGLAS, Director of the State Department of Health Services, State of California
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
Managed Pharmacy Care, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 12-55067
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MANAGED PHARMACY CARE, a California corporation, INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC., a California corporation, CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION FOR INDENPENDENT LIVING CENTERS, a California corporation and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the U S Department of Health and Human Services
Defendant - Appellant:
TOBY DOUGLAS, Director of Department of Health Care Services of State of California
California Hospital Associatio v. Toby Douglas, et al
as 12-55068
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION
Defendant - Appellant:
TOBY DOUGLAS, Director of the State Department of Health Services, State of California
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
California Medical Transportation Association Inc v. Toby Douglas et al
as 2:2011cv09830
Plaintiff:
California Medical Transportation Association Inc, GMD Transportation, Inc. and Lonny Slocum
Defendant:
Does, Toby Douglas and Kathleen Sebelius
Managed Pharmacy Care et al v. Kathleen Sebelius et al
as 2:2011cv09211
Plaintiff:
Mark Beckwith, California Foundation for Indenpendent Living Centers, Independent Living Center of Southern California Inc and others
Defendant:
Does, Toby Douglas and Kathleen Sebelius
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
