Cases 41 - 50 of 4,549
Pennington v. USA
as 5:2024cv81551
Petitioner:
Eric Keith Pennington
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hatch, Sr. v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Chadwick A. Hatch, Sr.
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration) and Richmond (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Pou v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Jesus David Pou
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley and Norfolk-NN (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jones v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00436
Plaintiff:
Ellis Jones
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration) and Alexandria (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Herring, Jr v. USA
as 4:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
Lametrice Herring, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00201
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Debt Collection Act
Harris v. USA
as 4:2024cv00043
Petitioner:
Deon Harris
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
SECO USA, Inc. v. Onclave Networks, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00140
Counter Defendant:
SECO USA, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Onclave Networks, Inc. and Option3 Ventures, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Taylor v. USA
as 2:2024cv00176
Petitioner:
Antonyo Taylor
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Andrews v. USA
as 2:2024cv00085
Petitioner:
Brett Ian Andrews
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
