Cases filed in Minnesota
Cases 41 - 50 of 8,336
Noe v. USA
as 0:2024cv00500
Petitioner: Peter George Noe
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Quality Supply Chain Co-Op, Inc. v. Cargill, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv00417
Defendant: Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation, Cargill Inc, Cargill Protein and others
Plaintiff: Quality Supply Chain Co-Op, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Light v. USA
as 0:2024cv00410
Petitioner: Augustus Quintrell Light
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Ringgold v. EssilorLuxottica S.A. et al
as 0:2024cv00349
Plaintiff: Pamela Ringgold
Defendant: EssilorLuxottica S.A., Luxottica Group, S.p.A., Essilor International SAS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Buckhanan v. USA
as 0:2024cv00286
Petitioner: Xavier Jerome Buckhanan
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Fathmath v. EssilorLuxottica S.A. et al
as 0:2024cv00260
Plaintiff: Isha Fathmath
Defendant: EssilorLuxottica S.A., Luxottica Group S.p.A., Essilor International SAS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
McClendon v. USA
as 0:2024cv00159
Petitioner: Douglas Edward McClendon
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Monson v. USA
as 0:2024cv00169
Petitioner: Peter James Monson
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Monson v. USA
as 0:2024cv00166
Petitioner: Chad Lee Monson
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Rodriguez-Hurtado v. USA
as 0:2024cv00156
Petitioner: Yuny Rodriguez-Hurtado
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?