Cases 41 - 50 of 75
Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah v. Myton, et al
as 15-4080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UTE INDIAN TRIBE OF THE UINTAH AND OURAY RESERVATION
Defendant - Appellee:
MYTON, a municipal corporation
Defendant:
THE STATE OF UTAH, DUCHESNE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Utah, ROOSEVELT CITY, a municipal corporation and others
Robbins v. Merrell et al
as 2:2015cv00156
Plaintiff:
Gale Robbins
Defendant:
Jeff Merrell, Joe McKea, David Fairy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Collett v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2014cv00871
Plaintiff:
Nathan Samuel Collett
Defendant:
State of Utah, Gary Herbert, Sean D. Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1901
Hackford v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2014cv00872
Plaintiff:
Richard Dewray Hackford
Defendant:
State of Utah, Gary Herbert, Sean D. Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1901
Hackford et al v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2014cv00873
Plaintiff:
Richita Hackford and Opal Hackford
Defendant:
State of Utah, Gary Herbert, Sean D. Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 0640
Jones, et al v. Norton, et al
as 14-4144
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEBRA JONES, individually and as the natural parent of Todd R. Murray, and as personal representative of the Estate of Todd R. Murray, for and on behalf of the heirs of Todd R. Murray and ARDEN C. POST, individually and as the natural parent of Todd R. Murray
Defendant - Appellee:
VANCE NORTON, Vernal City police officer in his official and individual capacity, VERNAL CITY, BLACKBURN COMPANY, DBA Thomas-Blackburn Vernal Mortuary and others
Gardner v. Wilkins, et al
as 14-4090
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDSON G. GARDNER, Uintah Indian Descendant
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL W. WILKINS, Uintah County Clerk-Auditor and G.A. PETRY, Uintah County Justice Court Judge
In re: Ute Indian Tribe
as 14-4062
Petitioner:
UTE INDIAN TRIBE OF THE UINTAH AND OURAY RESERVATION
Respondent:
DUCHESNE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Utah, STATE OF UTAH and UINTAH COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Utah
Defendant Third-Party Defendant:
BRUCE IGNACIO, Chairman of the Ute Tribal Business Committee, in his official capacity
Defendant:
MYTON, a municial corporation, ROOSEVELT CITY, a municipal corporation and DUCHESNE CITY, a municipal corporation
Third-Party Defendant:
GORDON HOWELL, Chairman of the Business Committee, RONALD J. WOPSOCK, STEWART PIKE, Member of the Ute Tribal Business Committee, in his official capacity and others
Jones, et al v. Norton, et al
as 14-4040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEBRA JONES, individually and as the natural parent of Todd R. Murray, and as personal representative of the Estate of Todd R. Murray, for and on behalf of the heirs of Todd R. Murray and ARDEN C. POST, individually and as the natural parent of Todd R. Murray
Defendant - Appellee:
VANCE NORTON, Vernal City police officer in his official and individual capacity, VERNAL CITY, BLACKBURN COMPANY, DBA Thomas-Blackburn Vernal Mortuary and others
Ute Indian Tribe v. State of Utah, et al
as 14-4031
Consolidated Plaintiff:
TIMPANOGOS TRIBE
Defendant Third-Party Defendant:
BRUCE IGNACIO, Chairman of the Ute Tribal Business Committee, in his official capacity
Defendant Counter Claimant:
STATE OF UTAH and DUCHESNE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Utah
Defendant Counter Claimant Third-Party Plaintiff - Appellant:
UINTAH COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Utah
Defendant Counter Claimant Third-Party Plaintiff - Appellee:
UTE INDIAN TRIBE OF THE UINTAH AND OURAY RESERVATION
Defendant:
MYTON, a municial corporation, ROOSEVELT COUNTY, a municipal corporation and DUCHESNE CITY, a municipal corporation
Third-Party Defendant:
GORDON HOWELL, Chairman of the Business Committee, RONALD J. WOPSOCK, STEWART PIKE, Member of the Ute Tribal Business Committee, in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Movant:
GARY GARDNER and TIMPANOGOS TRIBE SNAKE BANK SHOSHONE INDIANS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
