Cases 41 - 50 of 480
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv12871
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Daniel et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2022cv01213
Plaintiff:
Fifi Esperanca Daniel
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, John M. Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Cervantes Vargas et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2022cv01052
Plaintiff:
Maria Myrna Cervantes Vargas, Fernando Aurelio Juarico Morales and Porfirio Hugo Juarico Morales
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Laura B. Zuchowski and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv13137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Pjetri et al v. United States Attorney General et al
as 2:2022cv12662
Plaintiff:
Mark Pjetri and Merita Pjetri
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Director Ur M. Jaddou, Director Christopher Wray and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv12839
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00989
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv12572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv12568
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv12688
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
