Cases 41 - 50 of 56
SMITH v. FICHERA
as 2:2013cv04811
Plaintiff:
ELLEN SMITH
Defendant:
VLADIMIR FICHERA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
LLOYD v. GENTLE DENTIST et al
as 2:2013cv03796
Plaintiff:
DOLORES LLOYD
Defendant:
VLADIMIR DERESCIUC and GENTLE DENTIST, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
VIELOT v. MAIORANA
as 3:2013cv00055
Petitioner:
VLADIMIR VIELOT
Respondent:
CHARLES MAIORANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
SENKO v. FLORRY et al
as 5:2013cv00697
Plaintiff:
VLADIMIR SENKO
Defendant:
RODNEY FLORRY, JR. , ELAM BOLLINGER , MANHEIM, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv04368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
KUSHNIR et al v. AVIVA LIFE & ANNUITY COMPANY
as 2:2011cv07701
Plaintiff:
VLADIMIR KUSHNIR and V-4 MANAGEMENT, LLC
Defendant:
AVIVA LIFE & ANNUITY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brojakowski et al v. Martynovich et al
as 3:2011cv01990
Plaintiff:
Paul J. Brojakowski and Diane C. Brojakowski
Defendant:
Vladimir Martynovich and All New, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
AGARYOV v. OFFICEMAX INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2011cv02511
Plaintiff:
VLADIMIR AGARYOV
Defendant:
OFFICEMAX INCORPORATED , OFFICEMAX NORTH AMERICA, INC. and Z-LINE DESIGNS, INC.
Cross_claimant:
Z-LINE DESIGNS, INC.
Cross_defendant:
OFFICEMAX INCORPORATED and OFFICEMAX NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARCHUK v. LOWE et al
as 2:2011cv02304
Petitioner:
VLADIMIR MARCHUK
Respondent:
CHAD A. LOWE, WILLIAM H. RYAN, JR. and RISA VETRI FERMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MARCHUK v. LOWE et al
as 2:2011cv02305
Petitioner:
VLADIMIR MARCHUK
Respondent:
CRAIG A. LOWE, WILLIAM H. RYAN, JR. and SETH WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
