Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Johnson v. Pinellas County Government
as 8:2015cv00395
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Johnson
Defendant:
Pinellas County Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. State Of Florida
as 2:2014cv00447
Petitioner:
Edward W. Johnson
Respondent:
State Of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Perlman et al v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 9:2014cv80102
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Petitioner:
Robert Perlman , Jeanette Del Socorro Prieb , Johnnie Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Johnson v. State Of Florida et al
as 6:2013cv01315
Plaintiff:
Jefferson W. Johnson
Defendant:
State Of Florida and Orange County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALOSTAR BANK OF COMMERCE v. GLS FLORIDA PROPERTY 2 LLC et al
as 5:2011cv00406
Plaintiff:
ALOSTAR BANK OF COMMERCE
Defendant:
GLS FLORIDA PROPERTY 2 LLC, JASON R FLOM, HERBERT L GRAHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Akine v. Scott et al
as 5:2011cv00195
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Akine
Defendant:
Edward L. Scott, Michael W. Johnson and Donald McCathran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. K-Mart Corporation
as 1:2011cv20324
Plaintiff:
Edith Rodriguez
Defendant:
K-Mart Corporation and Bruce W. Johnson
Mediator:
Cindy Hannah
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Johnson v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2011cv00042
Petitioner:
Michael W. Johnson
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Centrifugal Air Pumps Australia v. TCS Obsolete, LLC et al
as 6:2010cv00820
Plaintiff:
Centrifugal Air Pumps Australia
Defendant:
TCS Obsolete, LLC, SCT Performance, LLC, Rick Trudo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dingess v. Dean et al
as 5:2010cv00138
Plaintiff:
Roger L. Dingess, Sr.
Defendant:
Ed Dean, Michael W. Johnson, Robert J. Douglas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
