Cases 41 - 50 of 768
Standfield v. Headley et al
as 3:2023cv01319
Petitioner:
Timothy Bryan Standfield
Respondent:
Asst Warden Joesph Headley and Attorney General State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Heck v. Neely
as 7:2023cv01147
Petitioner:
Kristen Raelyn Heck
Respondent:
Warden Kimberly K Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McCrary v. Rooker et al
as 2:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
Frankie McCrary
Defendant:
Captain/Warden Gretchen Rooker and Cynthia Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wertz v. Warden
as 2:2023cv01143
Petitioner:
Marcus Adam Wertz
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Powell v. Warden Smith
as 4:2023cv01132
Petitioner:
Horace Aaron Powell
Respondent:
Warden Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Medina v. Neely
as 7:2023cv01135
Petitioner:
Nativida Mercado Medina
Respondent:
Warden K Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Minnifield v. Warden Crabtree et al
as 5:2023cv00986
Petitioner:
Kennedy Minnifield
Respondent:
Warden Crabtree and Attorney General for the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ouedraogo v. Neely
as 7:2023cv00921
Petitioner:
Halima Ouedraogo
Respondent:
Warden K Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McFadden v. Skinner et al
as 7:2023cv00818
Petitioner:
Tedkieya McFadden
Respondent:
Skinner and Warden K Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sajere v. Neely
as 7:2023cv00788
Petitioner:
Ivie Shevon Sajere
Respondent:
Warden Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
