Cases 41 - 50 of 637
Braaten, Donald v. Keyes, R.D.
as 3:2024cv00017
Petitioner:
Donald Jay Braaten
Respondent:
Warden R.D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cabagua v. Eplett et al
as 2:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Mark Daniel Cabagua
Defendant:
Warden Cheryl Eplett, Kevin Carr, J Ludwig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sutton v. Doe et al
as 2:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Donsha D Sutton
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Capt Wiltzius, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Eplett
as 2:2024cv00004
Petitioner:
LaMondre Moore
Respondent:
Warden Cheryl Eplett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Helfrich, Richard v. Keys
as 3:2024cv00004
Petitioner:
Richard Helfrich
Respondent:
Warden Keys
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Schulteis v. Oakhill Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2023cv01654
Plaintiff:
Michael Schulteis
Defendant:
Oakhill Correctional Institution and Warden Olsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blunt v. Stevens
as 2:2023cv01533
Petitioner:
Lamarr Deprice Blunt
Respondent:
Warden Christopher Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brookshire v. Gierach
as 2:2023cv01512
Petitioner:
Dennis J Brookshire
Respondent:
Christopher Stevens and Warden Michael Gierach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Hepp et al
as 2:2023cv01489
Plaintiff:
Brushae Brown
Defendant:
Warden Randall Hepp, Emily Propson and Y Pusich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks et al v. Hepp et al
as 2:2023cv01493
Plaintiff:
James M Brooks
Defendant:
Warden Randall Hepp, Emily Propson and Yana Pusich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
