Cases 41 - 50 of 1,055
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03784
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Gomez v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04217
Plaintiff:
Martin B. Gomez
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Bard Davol, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lynch v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00318
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Martin Lynch
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Cory v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03648
Plaintiff:
Martin Cory
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Martin v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03127
Plaintiff:
Tonda Martin
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Frieling v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03068
Plaintiff:
Martin Frieling
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Martin v. Davol, Inc./ C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2023cv03432
Plaintiff:
Gerald Martin
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./ C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Robinson v. Butler et al
as 3:2023cv01611
Plaintiff:
Martin Robinson
Defendant:
Ohio State Patrol Lonnie Butler, V. Brown Legal Services, OH Dept. of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODR&C) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hendricks et al v. Total Quality Logistics, LLC
as 1:2010cv00649
Plaintiff:
Robert Hendricks, Scott Spitler, Nathan Parr and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
