Cases 41 - 50 of 5,211
Williams v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02223
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Williams
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dawson v. Sargus et al
as 2:2024cv02175
Plaintiff:
William T. Dawson, Jr.
Defendant:
Judge Edmund A Sargus, Jr, Christin Werner, Chief Judge Algenon L. Marbley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gonsalves v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02179
Plaintiff:
William Gonsalves
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
N8 Medical, Inc. et al v. Brown
as 2:2024cv02157
Plaintiff:
N8 Medical, Inc., N8 Medical, LLC and Kinnear Pharmaceuticals LLC
Defendant:
William E Brown
Smith v. Bolinger et al.
as 5:2024cv00787
Plaintiff:
DeAerre Smith
Defendant:
Joshua Bolinger, Deputy McCutcheon, Becky McCutcheon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Smith v. Bolinger et al.
as 5:2024cv00784
Plaintiff:
DeAerre Smith and Smurk
Defendant:
Joshua Bolinger, Deputy McCutcheon, Becky McCutcheon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopkins v. Indivior, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65404
Plaintiff:
William D. Hopkins
Defendant:
Indivior, Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00792
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Williams Jr. v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Williams Jr.
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ballis v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02042
Plaintiff:
William Ballis
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
