Cases 41 - 50 of 525
Hackett, III et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03163
Plaintiff:
Walter Hackett, III and Lorinda Hackett
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Easley v. Anderson et al
as 3:2022cv01397
Plaintiff:
D. Easley
Defendant:
Jori Anderson, Ms. Shaffer, Kelly Storm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kilichowski v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02704
Plaintiff:
Robert Jr. Walter Kilichowski
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Glaze v. Morgan et al
as 1:2022cv00379
Defendant:
Jane Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Plaintiff:
Cedric A. Glaze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Feaster v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 1:2022cv00313
Plaintiff:
Terrance J Feaster
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Ronald T. Erdos, Cynthia Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walters v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
Kevin Walters
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
McDougald v. May et al
as 3:2022cv01058
Plaintiff:
Jerone McDougald
Defendant:
Harold May, Mr. Walters, Major Mr. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burfitt v. May et al
as 3:2022cv00618
Plaintiff:
Lawrence R. Burfitt and Lawrence Burfitt
Defendant:
Warden Harold May, Deputy Warden Ryan Walters, Unit Manager Pettiway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
