Cases 41 - 50 of 84
CAPITOL SPECIALTY INSURANCE CORPORATION v. RAH OF WASHINGTON, DC, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv00917
Plaintiff:
CAPITOL SPECIALTY INSURANCE CORPORATION
Defendant:
RAH OF WASHINGTON, DC, INC., PAUL D. CASEY and ABIGAIL O. CASEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SELL v. SUPERIOR COURT et al
as 1:2018cv00909
Plaintiff:
BLAINE WASEL SELL
Defendant:
SUPERIOR COURT and WASHINGTON DC CITY GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SELL v. WASHINGTON DC CITY GOVERNMENT
as 1:2018cv00855
Plaintiff:
BLAINE WASEL SELL
Defendant:
WASHINGTON DC CITY GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ABALE GNALEGA v. WASHINGTON DC VETERANS MEDICAL CENTER
as 1:2018cv00514
Plaintiff:
REUEL JACQUES ABALE GNALEGA
Defendant:
WASHINGTON DC VETERANS MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KHOSHMOOD v. CITY OF WASHINGTON DC
as 1:2017cv02407
Plaintiff:
MOHSEN KHOSHMOOD
Defendant:
CITY OF WASHINGTON DC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WASHINGTON v. ST. LOUIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPT. et al
as 1:2017cv01020
Plaintiff:
JOHN WASHINGTON
Defendant:
ST. LOUIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPT., CITY OF ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI, RONALD HENDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS-STRIPLIN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2017cv00976
Plaintiff:
AAREN WILLIAMS-STRIPLIN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, DIRECTOR OF FBI WASHINGTON DC FIELD OFFICE, FBI POLICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
S&S INVESTMENTS, LLC v. NEAL et al
as 1:2017cv00796
Plaintiff:
S&S INVESTMENTS, LLC
Defendant:
NATHAN A. NEAL, PATRICK HORRELL, EDWARD S. COHN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
PAYNE v. BRITISH EMBASSY, WASHINGTON, DC
as 1:2017cv00297
Defendant:
BRITISH EMBASSY, WASHINGTON, DC
Plaintiff:
SHELAGH PAYNE
Cause Of Action: Family Medical Leave Act of 1993
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
