Cases 41 - 50 of 101
WATSON v. BOU et al
as 1:2019cv01200
Defendant:
VCRT TRUST OF COLOMBIA MARYLAND, EDWARD BOU and STEPHEN BOU
Plaintiff:
CURTIS LEE WATSON
WATSON v. GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2019cv00631
Respondent:
GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Petitioner:
CURTIS LEE WATSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WATSON v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2018cv01645
Plaintiff:
BOBBY KEITH WATSON
Defendant:
U.S. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. ANTHEM, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv01493
Defendant:
ANTHEM, INC, CIGNA CORP. and ANTHEM, INC.
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF MARYLAND, STATE OF CONNECTICUT and others
Petitioner:
KAISER PERMANENTE HEALTH PLAN, INC., TUFTS ASSOCIATED HEALTH PLANS, INC., MERCER and others
Special Master:
RICHARD A. LEVIE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
WATSON v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 1:2018cv00198
Plaintiff:
CLARA WATSON
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
CUMMINGS et al v. HORNE
as 1:2017cv02308
Plaintiff:
ELIJAH E. CUMMINGS , CAROLYN MALONEY , ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON and others
Defendant:
TIMOTHY O. HORNE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
WATSON v. TREASURER OF THE UNITED STATES
as 1:2017cv01960
Plaintiff:
MARVIN WATSON
Defendant:
TREASURER OF THE UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATSON v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2017cv01734
Petitioner:
CURTIS LEE WATSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
MULDROW v. SESSIONS et al
as 1:2017cv01347
Plaintiff:
LEALON (AMIR MUSA) MULDROW
Defendant:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, THOMAS KANE, IAN CONNERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
