Cases 41 - 50 of 94
Webb v. Rios et al
as 5:2015cv00386
Plaintiff:
Christopher Wayne Webb
Defendant:
FNU Rios, FNU Cobbins, FNU Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hilligoss et al v. Sandlin et al
as 5:2015cv00284
Plaintiff:
Kieth Hilligoss and Cullas Webb
Defendant:
Phillip Sandlin and Rebecca Sandlin Reavis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv00338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Webb v. Barlow et al
as 5:2014cv00833
Plaintiff:
Christopher Wayne Webb
Defendant:
FNU Barlow, Hector Rios and FNU Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00768
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cardoni et al v. Prosperity Bank, et al
as 4:2014cv00319
Plaintiff:
Chris Cardoni , Wesley Webb , Terry Blain and others
Defendant:
Prosperity Bank , Eric Davis and Anthony Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wade et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 5:2013cv00834
Plaintiff:
Diana Wade , Cheryle Thornabar , Mona Swofford and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Webb v. Rios
as 6:2013cv00292
Plaintiff:
Christopher Wayne Webb
Defendant:
Hector Rios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Webb v. Jones et al
as 6:2013cv00265
Petitioner:
Christopher Wayne Webb
Respondent:
Justin Jones and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Webb v. Jones et al
as 5:2013cv00493
Petitioner:
Christopher Wayne Webb
Respondent:
Justin Jones and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
