Cases 41 - 50 of 107
Fazzio et al v. Standard Examiner et al
as 1:2017cv00132
Plaintiff:
Sherrie Fazzio and Michael Fazzio
Defendant:
Standard Examiner, Sandusky Newspaper, Weber County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Weber v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv00039
Plaintiff:
Shelly Weber
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Calzada et al v. Roy City et al
as 1:2016cv00165
Plaintiff:
Maria Calzada , Manuela Rosales and Estate of Jose Calzada
Defendant:
Roy City, Weber County, Roy City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sussman v. Weber State University
as 2:2016cv01119
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Sussman
Defendant:
Weber State University and Utah State Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodward v. Weber County Jail Keisel Facility et al
as 2:2016cv01109
Plaintiff:
Ronald Michael Woodward
Defendant:
Weber County Jail Keisel Facility and Ogden Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Equality Utah et al v. Utah State Board of Education et al
as 2:2016cv01081
Plaintiff:
Equality Utah , Janet Doe , Justine Doe and others
Defendant:
Utah State Board of Education , Sydnee Dickson , Board of Education of Cache County School District and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yocum v. State of Utah et al
as 1:2016cv00098
Plaintiff:
Su-Yi Yocum
Defendant:
State of Utah, Utah Attorney Generals Office, Sean Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weber Luke Alliance v. Studio 1C
as 2:2016cv00389
Plaintiff:
Weber Luke Alliance
Defendant:
Studio 1C
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Webb v. State of Utah et al
as 1:2016cv00017
Plaintiff:
David Webb
Defendant:
State of Utah, Alpine City, American Fork City and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
