Cases 41 - 50 of 3,439
Slayton v. Akiri et al
as 4:2021cv03596
Plaintiff:
Kelly Elaine Slayton
Defendant:
Kenneth Akiri, Campu Solution X IT Company, Diamond Dialysis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tango Networks, Inc. v. Mobile X Global, Inc.
as 4:2021cv00842
Plaintiff:
Tango Networks, Inc.
Defendant:
Mobile X Global, Inc. and Skycrest Ventures, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv03102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Zorikova v. Gish et al
as 3:2021cv00220
Plaintiff:
Alla Zorikova
Defendant:
Casey Gish, Jamie Gregory, Christina Sato and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shaft Innovations UK Ltd. et al v. BTCT Innovations X, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00737
Plaintiff:
Shaft Innovations UK Ltd., Shaft Innovations, Inc. and Benyamin Nusair
Defendant:
BTCT Innovations X, LLC and Product Labs Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Galdenzi et al v. Auction.com et al
as 4:2021cv02244
Plaintiff:
Walter Galdenzi and Susan Galdenzi
Defendant:
Auction.com doing business as Ten-X, LLC, Ten-X, Inc. and CS Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
El-X v. Hyle et al
as 1:2021cv00201
Defendant:
D Feather, FNU Parks, D Dobbs and others
Plaintiff:
Antonius El-X
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00964
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Burke et al v. Intercontinental Terminals Company LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00834
Plaintiff:
Cecil J. Lewis, Clifton Lindsey, Lauretta K. Bush and others
Defendant:
Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc., NSK PRECISION AMERICA, INC., NSK-AKS PRECISION BALL COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
