Cases 41 - 50 of 1,048
Torres v. Kernan
as 4:2021cv02406
Respondent:
Scott Kernan
Petitioner:
Mario Torres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Michael Lena v. California Department of Corre, et al
as 21-15597
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL ANGELO LENA
Respondent / Appellee:
SCOTT KERNAN, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION DIRECTOR, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Jared Villery v. CDCR, et al
as 21-15425
Defendant:
M. PALLARES, OLEG LIFLYANDSKY, A. AITHAL and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ACOSTA, Dr., JAY JONES, RICHARD KENDALL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JARED M. VILLERY
Rickey Louis Alford - VEXATIOUS LITIGANT v. Kernan
as 2:2021cv01924
Respondent:
Scott Kernan
Petitioner:
Rickey Louis Alford - VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clarence Gipbsin v. Scott Kernan, et al
as 21-15627
Defendant / Appellee:
WONG, FRENCH, JUSTIN M. SCHMOLLINGER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLARENCE A. GIPBSIN, AKA Clarence Gibson
Louis Aguirre v. Clark Ducart, et al
as 21-15269
Defendant / Appellee:
CLARK E. DUCART, Warden, SCOTT KERNAN, S. BURRIS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOUIS J. AGUIRRE
Defendant:
D. WELLS and D. WILCOX
Hash v. Giacomazzi et al
as 5:2020cv01116
Defendant:
S. Lucas, C. Remillard, R. Persaud and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence George Hash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(HC) Alford - VEXATIOUS LITIGANT v. Kernan
as 2:2021cv00343
Plaintiff:
Rickey Louis Alford - VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Scott Kernan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allen Hammler v. Scott Kernan, et al
as 20-56421
Defendant / Appellee:
NEVAREZ, C/O, P. CORTEZ, Cor. Counselor (CC2), DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, Warden of RJD/SP and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALLEN HAMMLER
Marions Chillis v. Robert Neuschmid, et al
as 21-15062
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN D. OLIVER, SCOTT KERNAN, ROBERT NEUSCHMID, Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIONS CHILLIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
