Cases 41 - 50 of 267,325
Walker v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02058
Plaintiff:
Kurt Walker
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moore v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02045
Plaintiff:
Robert Moore
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
James v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02052
Plaintiff:
Dennis James
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moore v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02057
Plaintiff:
Tamica S Moore
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Armstrong v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02044
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Armstrong
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gonzales v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02048
Plaintiff:
Willie Gonzales
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thomas v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02056
Plaintiff:
Ann Thomas
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ocana et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02060
Plaintiff:
Ofelia Ocana and Homero Ochoa
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
County of Fulton v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 7:2024cv03257
Plaintiff:
County of Fulton
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharma Inc., Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. and others
Other:
Cephalon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Moczynski v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11143
Plaintiff:
Gerald W. Moczynski
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
