Cases 41 - 50 of 1,146
Chrustowski v. Best Buy
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Renee A. Chrustowski
Defendant:
Best Buy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
E. C. v. Houser, et al.
as 1:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Emmett Caldwell and E. C.
Defendant:
Trustee Barbara Houser, Boy Scout Plan of Reorganization, Zoom Video Communications Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sam's Auto Wholesale, Inc. v. The Auto Gallery
as 1:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Sam's Auto Wholesale, Inc.
Defendant:
The Auto Gallery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Chrustowski v. USPS et al
as 1:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Renee A. Chrustowski
Defendant:
USPS, USPS Headquarters, Giant Foods and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Nasir v. Nasir et al
as 1:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Malik Nasir
Defendant:
Naima Nasir, Register of Wills, Court of Chancery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Happle v. Wilson et al
as 1:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Thomas-Martin Happle
Defendant:
Kathleen Wilson, Doctor John Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Elad v. Truist Bank et al
as 1:2023cv01360
Plaintiff:
Joseph B. Elad
Defendant:
Truist Bank, Joshua Collins, Ballard Spahr LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ali-Bey v. Cain, M/CPL C
as 1:2023cv01387
Plaintiff:
Naseer Ali-Bey
Defendant:
Cain, M/CPL C
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hawkins v. Georgetown Police Department
as 1:2023cv01431
Plaintiff:
Gregory L. Hawkins
Defendant:
Georgetown Police Department and State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Hawkins v. Delaware State Police et al
as 1:2023cv01432
Plaintiff:
Gregory L. Hawkins
Defendant:
Delaware State Police and State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
