Cases 41 - 50 of 1,402
Powell v. Gilley et al
as 6:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Michael Powell
Defendant:
J. Gilley and Constance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lucas v. Gier et al
as 2:2023cv00178
Plaintiff:
Shannon Lucas
Defendant:
Officer Jacob Gier and William Poore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mata v. Grayson, Kentucky et al
as 0:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
Louis Mata, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Grayson, Kentucky and Roy Ison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vanwinkle v. Sgt Sizemore et al
as 5:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Donald Vanwinkle
Defendant:
Sgt Sizemore, C.O. Roberts, R.N. Combs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Bell County Fiscal Court et al
as 6:2023cv00219
Plaintiff:
Justin Howard
Defendant:
Bell County Fiscal Court, Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc., John or Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reed v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Jasper Reed and Montecarlos Marteze Gant
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Wallace
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Terrance Brown
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ball v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2023cv00335
Plaintiff:
Anthony Harold Ball
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mallory et al v. Smith et al
as 0:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
James Mallory, Saddiq Al-Rahman Muhhammad and Mrs. Porshia Moneice Mallory
Defendant:
Phillip Smith, John Vaught, Zachary R. Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
