Cases 41 - 50 of 4,195
Stockman v. Edwards
as 1:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
Randy Malcolm Stockman
Defendant:
Toney Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Lacroix. City of Pineville et al
as 1:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Charles Lacroix
Defendant:
City of Pineville and James Gilchrist
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Lighten v. Jim Taylor Chevrolet L L C
as 3:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Pamela Lighten
Defendant:
Jim Taylor Chevrolet and Jim Taylor Chevrolet L L C
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Do No Harm v. Edwards
as 5:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Do No Harm
Defendant:
John Bel Edwards and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Sampy v. Rabb et al
as 6:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Raynaldo Markeith Sampy, Jr
Defendant:
Jonathan Rabb, Brandon Dugas and Police Dept City of Lafayette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sampy v. Saloom et al
as 6:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Raynaldo Markeith Sampy, Jr
Defendant:
Douglas Saloom and City Court of Lafayette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller et al v. Simien et al
as 6:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Christopher Miller and Karlie Miller
Defendant:
Brett Simien, St. Landry Parish School System and St Landry Parish School System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
