Cases 41 - 50 of 26,319
DePonte v. Bowman et al
as 3:2024cv01414
Plaintiff:
David Arthur DePonte
Defendant:
Jessica Bowman and Daniel Queava
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tingle v. Defilippis
as 4:2024cv02543
Plaintiff:
Aaron Kristopher Tingle
Defendant:
Steve Defilippis and Law Office of Picone and Defilippis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
N.A. v. U.S.A.
as 4:2024cv02561
Plaintiff:
N.A.
Defendant:
U.S.A. and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hill v. Rita
as 4:2024cv02544
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon Hill
Defendant:
Rita
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Newsom et al
as 5:2024cv01415
Plaintiff:
Artero Collins
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, Jeff Macomber, Steven Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wyatt v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation
as 4:2024cv02305
Plaintiff:
Charles Martin Wyatt
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall
as 3:2024cv02516
Plaintiff:
Deshawn Rayshaad Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
A.Y. v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv01365
Plaintiff:
A.Y.
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Allwine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
A.L.R. v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv01360
Plaintiff:
A.L.R.
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Ray J. Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
A.C. v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv01385
Plaintiff:
A.C.
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Ray J. Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
