Cases 41 - 50 of 120,247
(PC) Rodriguez v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Antonio Rodriguez
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Booth v. Pouge, et al.
as 1:2024cv00486
Plaintiff:
Patrick J. Booth
Defendant:
Tyson Pouge, Lopez, Alva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcus R. Ellington Sr. v. E. Lake et al
as 2:2024cv03327
Plaintiff:
Marcus R. Ellington, Sr.
Defendant:
E. Lake, J. Moeckly, Lancaster City and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rigoberto Luna Luna v. Warden
as 2:2024cv03293
Petitioner:
Rigoberto Luna Luna
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Darrel R Fisher v. Gerald McKinney et al
as 2:2024cv03284
Plaintiff:
Darrel R Fisher
Defendant:
Gerald McKinney and Larry DiCieno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Nelson Ammons et al v. Ian Parkinson et al
as 2:2024cv03229
Plaintiff:
Charles Nelson Ammons, Bryant Miller and Alexander Volonakis
Defendant:
Ian Parkinson and County of San Luis Obispo, CA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Hill et al
as 3:2024cv00743
Petitioner:
Thomas Johnson
Respondent:
James Hill and R.J. Donovan Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alan Anderson v. Bryan Burkholz
as 2:2024cv01761
Petitioner:
Alan Anderson
Respondent:
Bryan Burkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(PC) Cordova v. Rodriguez, et al.
as 1:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
Zenaida Cordova
Defendant:
Greg Rodriguez and Michael Pallares
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kramer v. Broomfield et al
as 4:2024cv02417
Plaintiff:
Daniel A. Kramer
Defendant:
Ron Broomfield, Ralph Diaz, J. Clark Kelso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
