Cases 41 - 50 of 24,135
Frank Monaco Bazzo v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00635
Petitioner:
Frank Monaco Bazzo
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jimmie E. Stephens v. G. Matterson
as 2:2024cv02386
Petitioner:
Jimmie Stephens
Respondent:
Warden G. Matterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hung Duong Nguon v. James S. Hill et al
as 2:2024cv02297
Petitioner:
Hung Duong Nguon
Respondent:
James S Hill and Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alonzo McKinney v. Rocha
as 2:2024cv02295
Petitioner:
Alonzo McKinney
Respondent:
Rocha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Micheal Alan Goldberg v. Taylor
as 2:2024cv02313
Petitioner:
Micheal Alan Goldberg
Respondent:
Warden Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Glenn Arthur Smith, Jr. v. Melissa Rios Marques et al
as 2:2024cv02298
Petitioner:
Glenn Arthur Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
Melissa Rios Marques and Collete S. Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Dante Danil Carter v. F. Guzman
as 5:2024cv00567
Petitioner:
Dante Danil Carter
Respondent:
F Guzman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles Newman v. The People Of The State Of California
as 2:2024cv02167
Petitioner:
Charles Newman
Respondent:
The People Of The State Of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roderick Washington v. Richard Brumfield
as 2:2024cv02242
Petitioner:
Roderick Washington
Respondent:
Richard Brumfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Angel Torres v. B. Birkholz
as 2:2024cv02367
Petitioner:
Angel Torres
Respondent:
B. Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
