Cases 41 - 50 of 5,652
Berumen v. Segal et al
as 0:2024cv00777
Plaintiff:
Irene Berumen
Defendant:
Michael Segal, L. Linder, Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brandon v. Sherburne County Sheriff et al
as 0:2024cv00778
Plaintiff:
Morris Lee Brandon, III
Defendant:
Sherburne County Sheriff, Joel Brott and Correctional Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Fritel
as 0:2024cv00779
Plaintiff:
Roberto A. Williams
Defendant:
Mark Fritel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dilworth v. USA DO NOT DOCKET. ALL DOCKETING OCCURS IN THE CRIMINAL CASE.
as 0:2024cv00759
Petitioner:
Geraldo Jay Dilworth
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Broussard v. USA DO NOT DOCKET. ALL DOCKETING OCCURS IN THE CRIMINAL CASE.
as 0:2024cv00756
Petitioner:
Aaron Rhy Broussard
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Debenedetto v. Klien et al
as 0:2024cv00654
Petitioner:
Gary Debenedetto
Defendant:
M. Klien, E. Lindeman, S. Kraft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Debenedetto v. Rardin
as 0:2024cv00660
Petitioner:
Gary Debenedetto
Defendant:
Jared Rardin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Martinez v. Eischen
as 0:2024cv00637
Petitioner:
Micheal Delgado Martinez
Respondent:
Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Debenedetto v. Ford et al
as 0:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
Gary Debenedetto
Defendant:
Mr Ford, RN. Officer Davidson, Associate Warden Mells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ducasse v. King
as 0:2024cv00627
Plaintiff:
Hiram Ducasse, Jr.
Defendant:
Mark King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
